Question 304General Subjects - 1st Asst/Chief

70% to pass

Under the federal regulations of 33CFR Subchapter O, if a vessel equipped with a Type II Marine Sanitation Device enters a body of water where the discharge of treated or untreated sewage is prohibited, which of the following methods of securing the device to prevent the discharge of sewage is ACCEPTABLE if it is impractical to close the seacock and prevent its opening?

APlacing a warning sign on the door to the space enclosing the toilets advising all concerned that the vessel is entering a "no discharge zone".
BPlacing of tape forming an "X" over toilet and urinal bowls to convey to all concerned that the vessel is entering a "no discharge zone".
CMaking an announcement over the public address system advising all concerned that the vessel is entering a "no discharge zone".
DLocking the door to the space enclosing the toilets with a padlock or door handle key lock to prevent entry when the vessel is entering a "no discharge zone".
AI Explanation

The correct answer is D) Locking the door to the space enclosing the toilets with a padlock or door handle key lock to prevent entry when the vessel is entering a "no discharge zone". This is the correct answer because under 33 CFR Subchapter O, which governs marine sanitation devices, the regulations require that when a vessel equipped with a Type II Marine Sanitation Device enters a "no discharge zone", the device must be secured to prevent the discharge of sewage. Locking the door to the toilet space is an acceptable method to prevent access and discharge if it is impractical to close the seacock. The other options, such as warning signs, taping toilet bowls, or announcements, do not physically secure the sanitation device to prevent discharge as required by the regulations.

Want to practice with timed exams?

Download Coast Guard Exams for the full exam experience.

Get the App